The
Bill, the third-largest in the history of the State, was afforded just 21 hours
of debate time in the Seanad to discuss the 664 amendments tabled to the Bill,
with less than one-third of amendments being considered before the guillotine
fell. At the conclusion of the debate, only those amendments tabled by the
Government were accepted. While the Bill has been in development for a number
of years, the main opportunity for members of the opposition to shape the
legislation occurs in formal legislative stages.
The
Planning and Development Bill 2023 seeks to rewrite planning law in Ireland and
will replace it with a new regime which is both undemocratic and unworkable.
Opposition Senators tabled a significant volume of amendments, in good faith,
in an attempt to address some of the Bill’s many deficiencies. Government
demonstrated complete unwillingness to engage with members of the opposition in
a collegial manner, refusing to accept a single amendment other than those
proposed by the Minister.
The
skirting of usual good parliamentary practice with the imposition of a
guillotine, means that serious flaws persist in the legislation. Significant
issues have been raised in relation to the Bill’s compliance with the Aarhus
Convention, an international agreement which promotes public participation in
the planning process that Ireland has fully ratified. This particular issue
leaves the legislation wide open to legal challenge in Irish and European
courts.
Speaking
after the debate, Senator Higgins said: “The Planning Bill is deeply flawed and
problematic. Asking the Seanad to pass legislation which has been found to be
non-compliant with international law by the Aarhus Compliance Committee is
wrong and the Government has been extremely disingenuous during this entire
process. The Minister’s claims that the Bill is Aarhus compliant have been
found to be untrue and the Government displayed an appalling unwillingness to
meaningfully engage on or fix this issue. ”
“We
need a planning system which works and which allows communities to actually
have a say in local development. Instead what is proposed is a further
centralisation of power and a move to push the public out of the planning
process.”
Senator
Frances Black said: “The proposed legislation will mean that city and county
councillors will not get the same opportunity to input into local development
plans and the new National Planning Statements made by the Minister can
completely override the decisions local public representatives are elected to
make.”
Senator
Eileen Flynn said: “We had an opportunity to take real action on equality in
this Bill. The Government’s refusal to include strong measures on Traveller
accommodation and inclusive design is deeply disappointing. Travellers,
disabled people and other excluded groups have for too long been ignored in the
planning process and it seems the Government lacks the will to take real action
to fix this.”
Senator
Lynn Ruane concluded: “The Minister and the Government have shown absolute
contempt for the Seanad in the undermining of proper parliamentary procedure.
Notwithstanding the serious concerns we have about some of the more technical
elements of the Bill, the legislation demonstrates a total lack of ambition and
aspiration in terms of the communities we want to live in. The Bill as drafted
won’t promote the development of more vibrant, cohesive, inclusive and
sustainable communities, in fact it will undermine them through a minimalist
and exclusionary approach to public participation.”